In her recent book Why Animals Matter: Animal consciousness, animal welfare, and human well-being, Marian Stamp Dawkins at the University of Oxford
claims we still don't really know if other animals are conscious and that we
should "remain skeptical and agnostic... Militantly agnostic if necessary."
Dawkins inexplicably ignores the data that those at the meeting used to formulate their declaration, and goes so far as to claim that it is actually harmful to animals to base welfare decisions on their being conscious.
I consider this irresponsible. Those who choose to harm animals
can easily use Dawkins's position to justify their actions. Perhaps given the
conclusions of the Cambridge gathering, what I call "Dawkins's Dangerous Idea"
will finally be shelved. I don't see how anyone who keeps abreast of the
literature on animal pain, sentience and consciousness - and has worked closely
with any of a wide array of animals - could remain sceptical and agnostic about
whether they are conscious.
- Marc Bekoff
- Marc Bekoff
No comments:
Post a Comment