It is no accident, I would maintain, that quantum mechanics is so
wildly counterintuitive. Part of the nature of explanation is that it must
eventually hit some point where further probing only increases opacity
rather than decreasing it. Consider the problem of understanding the
nature of solids. You might wonder where solidity comes form. What if
someone said to you, "The ultimate basis of this brick's solidity is
that it is composed of a stupendous number of eensy weensy bricklike
objects that themselves are rock-solid"? You might be interested to
learn that bricks are composed of micro-bricks, but the initial question
- "What accounts for solidity?" - has been thoroughly begged. What we
ultimately want is for solidity to vanish, to dissolve, to disintegrate
into some totally different kind of phenomenon with which we have no
experience. Only then, when we have reached some completely novel, alien
level will we feel that we have really made progress in explaining the top-level phenomenon.
I first saw this thought expressed in the stimulating book Patterns of Discovery by Norwood Russell Hanson. Hanson attributes it to a number of thinkers, such as Isaac Newton, who wrote, in his famous work Opticks: "The parts of all homogeneal hard Bodies which fully touch one another, stick together very strongly. And for explaining how this may be, some have invented hooked Atoms, which is begging the Question." Hanson also quotes James Clerk Maxwell (from an article entitled "Atom"): "We may indeed suppose the atom elastic, but this is to endow it with the very property for the explanation of which... the atomic constitution was originally assumed." Finally, here is a quote Hanson provides from Werner Heisenberg himself: "If atoms are really to explain the origin of color and smell of visible material bodies, then they cannot possess properties like color and smell." So, although it is not an original thought, it is useful to bear in mind that greeness disintegrates..
- From the postscript to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, in Metamagical Themas: Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern by Douglas Hofstadter (via here)
I first saw this thought expressed in the stimulating book Patterns of Discovery by Norwood Russell Hanson. Hanson attributes it to a number of thinkers, such as Isaac Newton, who wrote, in his famous work Opticks: "The parts of all homogeneal hard Bodies which fully touch one another, stick together very strongly. And for explaining how this may be, some have invented hooked Atoms, which is begging the Question." Hanson also quotes James Clerk Maxwell (from an article entitled "Atom"): "We may indeed suppose the atom elastic, but this is to endow it with the very property for the explanation of which... the atomic constitution was originally assumed." Finally, here is a quote Hanson provides from Werner Heisenberg himself: "If atoms are really to explain the origin of color and smell of visible material bodies, then they cannot possess properties like color and smell." So, although it is not an original thought, it is useful to bear in mind that greeness disintegrates..
- From the postscript to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, in Metamagical Themas: Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern by Douglas Hofstadter (via here)
No comments:
Post a Comment